[MSN] The Rockwell Files. Steven Spielberg's stolen painting, a St. Louis art thief, and a plot to kill Martin Luther King. It could make a helluva movie.

[Museum Security Network Mailing list]

The Rockwell Files
Steven Spielberg's stolen painting, a St. Louis art thief, and a plot to
kill Martin Luther King. It could make a helluva movie.
By Chad Garrison  
Published: June 6, 2007
 
The fallout was bound to get ugly. But who knew it would get so strange? 

Photos and links:
http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2007-06-06/news/the-rockwell-files

Robin Eley 
Norman Rockwell's Russian Schoolroom.
 
The police report of the painting's 1973 theft
Robin Eley 
Robin Eley 
Subject(s): James Earl Ray, American Independent Party, Jack Solomon, House
Select Committee on Assassinations, Martin Luther King Jr., Creative Art
Studio, Norman Rockwell, Art Loss Register, FBI, Steven Spielberg In March
filmmaker Steven Spielberg was found in possession of a stolen Norman
Rockwell painting. As the Wall Street Journal, the Associated Press, CNN and
countless other media outlets reported then, Spielberg purchased the
pilfered art for $200,000 in 1989 - some sixteen years after it disappeared
from a suburban St. Louis gallery during an early-morning burglary. 

The artwork in question, an oil-on-canvas piece titled Russian Schoolroom,
was commissioned by Look magazine in 1967. Today it has a value of nearly
$700,000. According to federal authorities, Spielberg first learned of the
painting's dubious provenance in late February, when one of his employees
noticed the painting listed on the FBI's Art Crime Team Web site. In a press
release issued March 2, the FBI stated: "Mr. Spielberg is cooperating fully
with the FBI and will retain possession of the Russian Schoolroom until its
disposition can be determined." 

Now a civil legal battle has erupted over the ownership of the filched
painting. Last month Jack Solomon - owner of the now-defunct Clayton art
gallery, Arts International, from which the painting was stolen in 1973 -
sued both Spielberg and the FBI for ownership of the painting. 

The lawsuit filed in federal court in Solomon's home state of Nevada alleges
that the FBI "has allowed defendant Spielberg to retain possession of the
Rockwell painting and failed to return the subject artwork to plaintiff
Solomon despite the FBI's actual knowledge of the theft, recovery and
ownership." 

Meanwhile, Judy Goffman Cutler, the Rhode Island-based art dealer who sold
the painting to Spielberg in 1989, has filed suit against Solomon and the
Art Loss Register Inc., an agency that is assisting Solomon in retrieving
the painting. In a lawsuit also filed last month in federal court, Goffman
Cutler claims Solomon's insurer paid him $25,000 for the artwork following
the heist and that he no longer has any claim to the painting. 

Goffman Cutler further alleges that the Art Loss Register intimidated her by
threatening to have criminal charges filed against her and that Jack Solomon
defamed her character in an interview with Riverfront Times this spring. In
Kristen Hinman's article published March 7, Solomon claims Goffman Cutler
"should have known better" and "could have checked that there's been a
record of this ever since the day it was stolen." 

Goffman Cutler also asserts that Spielberg - an avid art collector and board
member for the Norman Rockwell Museum in Massachusetts - severed his
business relationship with her shortly after Solomon made his accusations to
the paper. She is asking the court to award her $5 million for the loss of
the Spielberg account and another $10 million for "general damage to her
reputation in her profession." 

On May 11 the movie mogul transferred title of Russian Schoolroom back to
Goffman Cutler in exchange for another Rockwell piece. Spielberg spokesman
Marvin Levy says the filmmaker is cooperating with officials and the FBI has
been kept abreast of every move. 

"Steven was prepared to turn it over to the FBI, but they asked us to hold
onto it for safekeeping," says Levy. "We're doing whatever they tell us." 

Solomon and his attorneys contend that Spielberg should never have signed
the title to the painting back over to Goffman Cutler. The maneuver, they
assert, does not clear the famed director of Schindler's List and other
Oscar-winning films of culpability. 

"It's very disappointing that Steven Spielberg - who is so active in
Holocaust causes and other philanthropies - chose in this case not to assist
a theft victim recover what's his," says Christopher Marinello, general
counsel for the Art Loss Register in New York. 

But even as new allegations over the ownership of the painting come to
light, parties on both sides of the debate are whispering of a far more
intriguing wrinkle to the story. They note that the government press
releases that heralded the painting's discovery last March make no mention
of the person (or persons) who stole Russian Schoolroom in the first place. 

The omission, say people familiar with the case, could be for good reason
and may very well be tied to the thief's association with a St. Louis-based
plot to kill Martin Luther King Jr. It's a wild story, full of FBI
oversights and fumbles - and a tale the feds might prefer remain a mystery. 

 

Mary Ellen Shortland was 28 years old and working as assistant director of
Arts International when someone smashed though the gallery's front door on
June 25, 1973. 

Shortland, now 62 and owner of Creative Art Gallery & Framing in south St.
Louis, recalls the theft of Russian Schoolroom as one of the great
disappointments in her young career. She says Arts International was hosting
an exhibit of signed Rockwell prints that June. In an effort to build
publicity for the three-week show, Jack Solomon (who owned Arts
International, as well as dozens of other galleries across the nation) had
an employee from one of his Kansas City studios drive Russian Schoolroom to
St. Louis. 

The painting had been here for just one day when on June 21 Shortland sold
it for $25,000 to the late Bert Elam, a St. Louis concrete contractor and
art collector. Elam agreed to let the gallery display the work until the end
of the show. Four days later, on June 25, a thief made off with the painting
and Shortland nearly lost her best customer. 

"Mr. Elam was very unhappy that I'd talked him into letting us keep the
painting," recalls Shortland. "Later he found out that the painting was
probably worth more like $40,000. He'd gotten a heck of a deal, only for it
to be robbed out from under him." 

In the end, the gallery reimbursed Elam the money he put down on the
painting and Arts International retained title to the work. Later the
gallery was paid $25,000 from its insurer for the loss. 

A few weeks after the theft, Elam hired a private detective to investigate.
Shortland recalls that the detective came back with disturbing news. "He
said he'd found the people who'd stolen it, and they were a bad outfit,"
remembers Shortland. "He warned Mr. Elam that even if he got the painting
back, they'd just steal it again." 

Shortland would eventually forget about the painting. Then - sixteen years
after its disappearance - she was flipping through the July/August 1989
edition of the trade magazine Art & Auction when she came across an
advertisement announcing the sale of Russian Schoolroom. 

"I did a complete double-take," she says. "That painting was stolen, and it
cost me a lot of money and headaches. I thought to myself: 'You got to be
kidding me.'" 

Shortland says she tried to call Jack Solomon at his Chicago offices but was
unable to get through. She then called Judy Goffman Fine Art in Manhattan,
which was listed in the magazine as the gallery selling the work. "I asked,
'Do you actually have the painting?'" recalls Shortland. "They said, 'Sure.'
They were asking something like $175,000 for it." 

Shortland's queries into the work were later chronicled by former Riverfront
Times reporter Wm. Stage in the October 11, 1989, issue of this paper. Stage
wrote that he also attempted to get in touch with Solomon to no avail. He
did, however, succeed in interviewing Judy Goffman Cutler, who told him
she'd recently sold the Rockwell to a person whom she declined to name. 

As to the claims that the painting had been stolen, Stage reported that
Goffman Cutler told him the artist often did several studies of one
painting. The stolen Rockwell, surmised Goffman Cutler, must have been a
different version of the one she'd recently sold. 

Stage later interviewed an agent with the FBI who spoke on the condition
that he not be quoted directly or named in the story. The agent told Stage
the FBI investigated the painting a year earlier, in 1988, when a Rockwell
scholar notified the agency that Russian Schoolroom was listed for sale at
an auction in New Orleans. (Goffman Cutler won the bidding at $70,400.) The
agent told Stage the matter was then routed to the FBI's St. Louis office,
but the investigation became stymied when no one could find a police report
for the stolen work. 

This past March Frank Brostrom, a special agent in charge of the FBI's Art
Crime Team, told Riverfront Times that he was prompted to reopen the case in
2004 when "a friendly source in the community" tipped him off to Stage's
1989 article. He, too, acknowledged that the police report was missing. 

"For whatever reason authorities at the time were unable to locate the
original police report or confirm the painting had ever been stolen,"
Brostrom told the RFT. 

Earlier this year agent Frank Brostrom was transferred from the FBI's St.
Louis office to North Carolina. He could not be reached for comment for this
story. Agents familiar with the Russian Schoolroom case in St. Louis and Los
Angeles would not comment on specifics other than what's already been
reported. 

If, however, the police report was missing back in 1989, it's now readily
available at the Clayton Police Department. "I got a call from the FBI about
two years ago on this and we were able to pull the report from our archives
right away," says Clayton police captain Kevin Murphy. "How or why that
wasn't the case then, I can't tell you." 

The six-page report gives the value of the painting as $20,000 and notes the
owner as both Arts International and Bert Elam. An appendix to the report
provides a witness testimony from a man who claimed to see a black male
break through the front door of the gallery at 6:40 a.m. and leave seconds
later with a painting tucked under his arm. Nothing else in the gallery was
touched during the smash-and-run. 

Clayton police can produce several more larceny reports from the same
address at 8113 Maryland Avenue. During a stretch in the mid-1970s the
gallery was a constant target, with a persistent thief (or thieves)
burglarizing the gallery on at least four separate occasions between 1973
and 1977. 

The most interesting of those break-ins occurred July 8, 1976, when a crook
pried open the front door to the gallery and left with seven Rockwell
lithograph prints valued at more than $7,000. 

In late February 1978 those prints would be recovered in the Rock Hill home
of Russell G. Byers. A notorious St. Louis art thief, Byers would testify
before the House Select Committee on Assassinations in May 1978 that he'd
once been offered $50,000 by two Jefferson County businessmen to kill Martin
Luther King Jr. 

Byers declined the offer, but the House committee found enough
circumstantial evidence to believe James Earl Ray may have been motivated by
the very same bounty when he gunned down King in Memphis on April 4, 1968. 

 

Several inches of snow lay on the ground the night of Sunday, January 29,
1978, when an old Chevrolet Impala pulled up in front of the Saint Louis Art
Museum. Three men in ski masks emerged from the vehicle. One of them carried
a sledgehammer. 

In plain sight of people sledding on Art Hill, the men smashed a window and
disappeared into the building. Two minutes later at 10:39 p.m., the men
exited the museum, taking with them four statues valued at nearly $100,000 -
including Frederic Remington's The Bronco Buster, valued at nearly $40,000. 

Three weeks later - on Monday, February 20 - thieves once again broke into
the museum. This time they smashed through the glass door to the museum's
east wing at approximately 8:24 p.m. The burglars went up the east stairway
and made off with three bronze sculptures by famed French sculptor Auguste
Rodin, best known for his iconic piece The Thinker. By the time the museum
guards arrived minutes later, the thieves and the Rodin sculptures - valued
at $45,000 - were nowhere to be found. 

Eight days after the second museum heist, St. Louis detectives picked up
John A. Crenshaw on federal charges of robbing a jewelry store in Illinois.
They were interrogating the 25-year-old suspect at police headquarters when
Crenshaw shocked police by implicating himself in the museum break-ins. 

Crenshaw told the detectives that Russell Byers had taken him to the museum
prior to the January 29 robbery and shown him which statues he wanted him to
steal. He said Byers paid him and his accomplices $700 for the first museum
burglary. Crenshaw burglarized the museum a second time because the first
theft had been "so easy." Shortly after both robberies Crenshaw allegedly
handed over the stolen art to Byers in a street exchange in the 5500 block
of Cabanne Avenue in north city. 

Crenshaw suggested that at least six of the seven stolen statues could be
found with Byers. The seventh statue, a wood carving of St. Sebastian
appraised at $4,500, was hidden away in Crenshaw's garage in north St.
Louis. At 11 a.m. some 20 law enforcement officials - including the FBI -
descended on Byers' home in Rock Hill. They carried with them a search
warrant. When Byers' wife refused them entry, they broke through a door pane
and entered the home. 

The statues weren't there, but police found plenty of other loot. As Byers'
wife and two teenage children stood outside on the lawn, police removed an
estimated $300,000 worth of stolen artwork - including two paintings signed
by Rembrandt, six oriental rugs, more than 100 silver candelabras, jade
dishes and the seven Norman Rockwell lithographs stolen from Arts
International in the 1976 burglary. 

It would take another several weeks before the police recovered the six
missing statues from the museum. Remington's The Bronco Buster turned up in
a Goodwill drop box on Forest Park Avenue. Two other statues were found at a
hotel on Oakland Avenue. Other statues were found in the back lot of a metal
company on Manchester Road. 

A few hours after police stormed his home, Byers turned himself into city
police. The 46-year-old Byers gave his occupation as a vending-machine
dealer. He was released on a $5,000 bond. At the time the St. Louis
Post-Dispatch reported Byers had been arrested in St. Louis City and St.
Louis County on several occasions in the 1960s. 

In 1965 he had been convicted in U.S. District Court in St. Louis of
conspiracy to commit auto theft and was placed on probation. Records show
Byers faced two criminal charges in St. Louis County in the 1970s. Both
cases remain sealed. 

In the weeks and months following the first museum burglary in 1978, two of
Byers' and Crenshaw's associates met violent deaths. Twenty-nine-year-old
Charles Gunn, who assisted Crenshaw in the first break-in, was found shot in
the head February 17 in a north St. Louis alley. On June 11 police
discovered the disfigured body of 42-year-old Sam White in a field in
Madison County, Illinois. Described by police as "Byers' right-hand man"
White had been shot three times and his body so badly burned it took several
days to identify him. 

After initially implicating Byers in the museum thefts, Crenshaw refused to
testify against him in court. Crenshaw was sentenced to four years in
prison. Byers got off scot-free. 

In July 1978 St. Louis Circuit Attorney George Peach told the Post-Dispatch
that without Crenshaw's testimony, the case against Byers was "too weak" to
pursue. In St. Louis County, the prosecutor's office gave the newspaper a
similar account. They would not file charges against Byers for possessing
the Rockwell lithographs stolen from Arts International. 

It wasn't just local prosecutors who were dropping charges against Byers. On
May 9, 1978, the U.S. House of Representatives granted Byers immunity under
the Organized Crime Control Act for any possible prosecution involving his
association with a St. Louis-based plot to assassinate Martin Luther King. 

Today, those entangled in the legal battle with Steven Spielberg wonder if
Byers didn't cut a similar deal to avoid prosecution in the disappearance of
Russian Schoolroom. They say given Byers' taste for illicit art, it's likely
he's the person who contracted the painting's heist in 1973. 

Byers' involvement might also explain why no one has been charged with the
theft - and why the FBI failed to close in on the painting in 1988 and 1989
when its agents claim the police report went missing. 

Sound far-fetched? Perhaps, but Byers himself does not entirely rule it out.


 

Russell Byers' modest brick home sits at the end of a cul-de-sac in the
quiet suburb of Rock Hill. It's the same house police raided back in 1978. A
picture window with a blue awning faces out into the front lawn. Two yapping
Yorkshire terriers announce the arrival of anyone who steps near the
property. 

On a recent weekday afternoon the silhouette of a man appears behind a
screened door. Before I can even reach the driveway, the man calls out: "Who
are you? What do you want?" 

I explain that I'm looking for Russell Byers. I want to talk to him about
some art thefts back in the 1970s. The man responds that Byers is not home,
and even if he were, why would he want to talk? "What's in it for him?" 

I'm curious if he knows anything about a famous Norman Rockwell painting
stolen in 1973. The painting, I explain, is now in the possession of
filmmaker Steven Spielberg. 

"It's a hell of a story, isn't it?" the man responds. "Maybe there's a lot
more to it than you know." After a few minutes the man steps outside and
walks over to where I'm standing in the driveway. A wrought-iron fence
separates us. 

At 76 years old, Byers no longer appears like the underworld thug newspaper
articles once made him out to be. In fact, he looks downright grandfatherly.
His white hair is parted neatly down the side. He wears slip-on loafers with
blue socks, a pair of stone-colored khakis and a short-sleeve Oxford cloth
shirt. A silver Rolex dangles from his left arm. 

Byers' cheeks are a ruddy pink. He blinks his blue eyes constantly - the
result, he says, of surgery to relieve a problem with his tear ducts. "Don't
think I'm retarded," he says of the blinking. "I still have all my marbles."


Byers then returns to the matter at hand: his possible connection to stolen
Rockwell painting. "Why would I want to tell you anything about that? Why
would I want the aggravation and the humiliation?" 

I tell him that the statute of limitations for the theft has long since
expired. I ask him if anyone else has contacted him about Russian
Schoolroom. The FBI, he confirms, has asked him about the painting. Any more
information, says Byers, will cost me. He wants money to talk. 

I tell him that it's against the policy of the RFT to pay sources, adding
that I doubted the New York Times paid him when it interviewed him for a
front-page story on July 26, 1978, which revealed for the first time Byers'
role in a St. Louis plot to assassinate King. 

"I was in Newsweek and Time magazine, too," boasts Byers. "But none of them
got the whole story." 

The article published in the New York Times in 1978 described Byers'
testimony before the House committee as an "embarrassment" to the FBI.
According to the Times article - and backed by congressional reports - an
informant first told the FBI in 1973 that Byers knew of a conspiracy hatched
in St. Louis in the 1960s to kill the civil rights leader. But the FBI
misfiled the information and it did not come to light until 1978 - long
after several of the key players in the scheme were dead and gone. 

When contacted by the House committee in 1978, Byers first denied any
knowledge that he'd been offered money to kill King. Later he agreed to
testify in exchange for immunity. Byers, according to congressional reports,
told the committee that he was approached in late 1966 or '67 by John
Kauffmann, a former St. Louis stockbroker and owner of a motel and drug
company in Imperial. 

The two men had a business relationship of sorts, with Kauffmann accepting
payment from Byers in exchange for allowing him to squirrel away stolen
merchandise at Kauffmann's Jefferson County motel. Byers told the committee
that in '66 or '67 Kauffmann asked him if he would like to make $50,000. 

The following comes directly from the committee report: "Kauffmann told him
to meet him at 6:30 that evening, which Byers did, and together they drove
to the home in Imperial of John Sutherland, a St. Louis patent attorney. The
three men met in a study that Byers described as decorated with Confederate
flags and Civil War memorabilia. There was a rug replica of a Confederate
flag as well, and Sutherland was wearing what appeared to Byers to be a
Confederate colonel's hat. 

"After some social conversation, Byers asked Sutherland what he would have
to do for the $50,000. Sutherland said he would have to kill, or arrange to
have killed, Dr. Martin Luther King. Byers, who told the committee he did
not know at the time who Dr. King was, asked where that amount of money
would come from. 

"Sutherland told him he belonged to a secret southern organization that had
plenty of money. According to Byers, no names were mentioned. Byers said he
neither accepted nor rejected the offer, indicating he would think it over.
Outside the door of Sutherland's home, however, he told Kauffmann he was not
interested." 

Based on Byers' testimony, the House committee launched what it described as
a "full-scale investigation" of Byers, Kauffmann and Sutherland. The
committee discovered that Byers had told two St. Louis attorneys the same
story in 1968 and again in 1974. Both attorneys corroborated Byers' story
under questioning. 

Further, an unpaid informant for the Jefferson County sheriff's office in
the 1960s testified to hearing the same "standing offer to murder Dr. King"
among guests who frequented Kauffmann's Buff Acres motel, which at the time
was a known haven for prostitutes, drug dealers and petty criminals. 

Kauffmann died in April 1974. John Sutherland had passed away four years
earlier. But in 1968 both men were active in the American Independent Party,
which backed segregationist Alabama governor George Wallace for president.
Also heavily involved in local efforts to elect Wallace was James Earl Ray's
brother, John Larry Ray. 

The House committee described John Ray's now-shuttered Grapevine Tavern
across from Benton Park in south St. Louis as a "distribution point for
American Party campaign literature." John Ray was even known to drive voters
to the election office to register with the party. 

Also active in the American Independent Party was James Earl Ray, who was
serving a twenty-year sentence for armed robbery when he broke out of the
Missouri State Penitentiary in Jefferson City in April 1967. While on the
lam, Ray worked briefly for the Wallace campaign in California. 

The committee believed Ray's brothers, John and Jerry Ray, assisted him
during his flight from justice. And while the congressional investigators
could find no "direct link" between the principals of the St. Louis
conspiracy and King's killer, they believed there was a likelihood that word
of the standing offer on Dr. King's life reached James Earl prior to the
assassination. 

"James Earl Ray may simply have been aware of the offer and acted with a
general expectation of payment after the assassination," the House committee
reported. "Or he may have acted, not only with an awareness of the offer,
but also after reaching a specific agreement, either directly or through one
or both brothers, with Kauffmann or Sutherland." 

The committee concluded its investigation into Byers' claims of a St. Louis
conspiracy by opining: "It is unfortunate that this information was not
developed in 1968, when it could have been pursued by law enforcement
agencies. It is a matter on which reasonable people may legitimately differ,
but the committee believes that the conspiracy that eventuated in Dr. King's
death in 1968 could have been brought to justice in 1968." 

Today Byers shies away from discussing what he told the congressional
committee in 1978. He says journalists and conspiracy theorists still knock
on his door, trying to get him to share his story. None, apparently, have
forked over enough cash to hear his tale. 

Byers, meanwhile, says he remains confused by the testimony of at least one
individual from the congressional hearings. Murray Randall was one of the
St. Louis lawyers who testified to hearing Byers discuss the offer to
assassinate King in 1968 and again in 1974. Later Randall went on to become
a judge in St. Louis. 

"The judge told the FBI that I was the most notoriously dangerous criminal
in St. Louis," says Byers. "I don't know where that came from. We were
friends." 

Byers says he never cut a deal with the feds to avoid prosecution for the
Saint Louis Art Museum burglaries in 1978 and takes issue with allegations
that he killed or arranged for the murder of accomplices Charlie Gunn and
Sam White. "I didn't have anything to do with it," says Byers. "Black guys
were always killing each other back then. What can I say? 

"Don't make me out to be a bad guy," Byers tells me. "The media always makes
me out to be a bad guy. I'm no murderer. I've never killed anyone." 

I'm not saying you killed anyone, I tell him. I simply want to discuss what
- if anything - he knows about the Russian Schoolroom painting. When he
again brings up the subject of money, I suggest I might have the wrong
person - that someone else probably stole the painting. 

As I walk down the driveway to my car, Byers coyly responds, "You know,
you're right. I'm sure art thieves all over the world were targeting that
little gallery in Clayton. Come back later," he adds, "when you have your
pocketbook." 


http://www.riverfronttimes.com/2007-06-06/news/the-rockwell-files

____________________________________
Museum Security Network
Museum Security Consultancy
Ton Cremers
Postbus 3213
3003 AE Rotterdam
+31 10 2233897
+31 6 242 246 20
toncremers at museum-security.org
_______________________________________