[MSN] German art lovers angered by painting's 'surrender'
Museum Security Network Mailinglist
msn-list at te.verweg.com
Tue Aug 15 21:12:38 CEST 2006
German art lovers angered by painting's 'surrender'
From Roger Boyes, of The Times, in Berlin
An influential art dealer says there was no legal or moral case for the
restitution of Ernst Ludwig Kirchner's Berlin Street Scene
Art lovers are fighting to keep in Germany an evocative 1913 painting of
a prostitute that was recently given back to its Jewish former owners.
The row over the painting — Berlin Street Scene by the expressionist
Ernst Ludwig Kirchner — could lead to a fundamental overhaul of the way
the Government deals with art confiscated by the Nazis.
The painting was returned to the heirs of the German Jewish shoe factory
owner Alfred Hess in July after almost two years of secret negotiation
with the regional government of Berlin.
Within days Christie’s had announced that it would be put up for sale in
New York.
“It is the most significant work of German expressionism that has ever
been put up for auction,” Andreas Rumbler, of Christie’s Germany, says.
But Bernd Schultz of the Villa Grisebach auction house — one of the most
influential art dealers in Germany — says there was never any real
legal, or even moral, basis for handing the painting over.
“Like many other German businessmen, Alfred Hess was made bankrupt by
the world economic crisis of 1929,” says Herr Schultz. “All he had left
was a great art collection.” The family started to sell paintings to
survive.
When the Nazis came to power in 1933 the Hess family fled to Britain.
Berlin Street Scene was sent to Switzerland for sale but was eventually
sold to the Frankfurt collector Carl Hagemann in 1936. After the war it
was acquired by the German state and has become a cornerstone of
Berlin’s famous collection of expressionist art.
The Berlin government argues that the Hess family was forced to sell
because of Nazi anti-Semitic persecution and that the price was
artificially low.
“One cannot doubt the racial persecution of the former owners,” said Dr
Hans-Gerhard Husung, the art specialist for the Berlin government. The
city was therefore obliged to return the painting to the heirs.
Not true, says Herr Schultz, who is gathering support from across the
German art world, which has long felt that formerly Jewish-owned art is
being surrendered without proper examination of the ownership records.
“The collector Hagemann financed his art purchases with income earned
from patents — he was a knowledgeable and above all an honourable man
who was a lifelong friend of the painter,” Herr Schultz says.
There was no suggestion that he had cheated the Hess family, nor that he
was an instrument of Nazi persecution.
The painting comes up for sale on November 8, leaving too little time to
raise the estimated £13 million needed to buy the painting back for
Germany and for Berlin, says Herr Schultz.
Even so, say German art market sources, some industrialists have been
approached and are considering putting in a bid. “This cries out for a
rescue operation,” says Herr Schultz.
The restitution wave has also been irritating the art world in Austria
where a Gustav Klimt portrait was returned to a Jewish family. The
Austrians tried to raise the necessary money to buy it and to keep it in
a Vienna museum. But the picture was already on its way to the auction
house before Austrian art lovers could be mobilised.
It was put up for auction in June and was bought by Ronald Lauder, the
cosmetics tycoon, for £71 million, making it the world’s most expensive
painting.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk
More information about the MSN-list
mailing list