[CPProt.net] Museum exhibits a creationist viewpoint

[MusSecNetworkCulPropProtNet]

http://news.yahoo.com/s/chitribts/20050807/ts_chicagotrib/museumexhibitsacre
ationistviewpoint
 
Museum exhibits a creationist viewpoint 
 

By Lisa Anderson Tribune national correspondent Sun Aug 7, 9:40 AM ET 

Tucked into a leafy fold of the Ozark Mountains, a new dinosaur museum
boldly goes where few museums have gone before--deep into the pages of
Genesis. 

At first glance, with its research-quality replicas and lush dioramas of
prehistoric Earth, the Museum of Earth History, which opened in April in
this Victorian spa town, may seem like any other facility devoted to
dinosaurs and fossils. But with exhibits aligned with the Bible's six days
of creation, it also is emblematic of the increasing volume in the national
debate over how evolution should be taught in public schools and the
emboldening of those who oppose or question evolution.

At issue, in state legislatures, school boards, museums and other cultural
institutions across the country, is whether evolution, Charles Darwin's
widely accepted theory that all life descended from common ancestors and
developed through natural selection and random mutation, should be presented
alone or in conjunction with alternative explanations.

Most visitors to the Museum of Earth History prefer the explanation in
Genesis. And that is exactly what the museum, a joint project of the
non-profit, Oklahoma-based Creation Truth Foundation and Eureka Springs'
Great Passion Play outdoor Bible theme park, offers.

Suspended overhead in one display, for example, is a replica of a
Pteranodon, a pointy-headed flying reptile with a 33-foot wingspan, hollow
bones and a bony ruffle on its skull. Visitors are told: "Each of these
unique design features indicate that Pteranodons were created to fly, not
that they slowly evolved into flying creatures."

Similar creationist viewpoints appear on plaques throughout the museum, a
3,500-square-foot prototype for a series of regional museums 10 times that
size, the first of which is planned for Dallas in 2007.

Finishing the tour with their two sons in tow, Robert and Debbie Archer,
surgeons from Tulsa, said they were gratified to visit a museum that
reflects their beliefs and not Darwin's.

That is why he developed the museum, said G. Thomas Sharp, founder and
chairman of the Creation Truth Foundation.

"There is so much demographic data telling us that about 50 percent of the
American public believes in the biblical story of origins," said Sharp, 62,
a former high school science teacher.

According to a November 2004 Gallup Poll, 45 percent or "almost half of the
U.S. population believes that human beings did not evolve, but instead were
created by God--as stated in the Bible--essentially in their current form
about 10,000 years ago." The number of Americans who say they believe that
has not dipped below 44 percent since Gallup began polling on the issue in
1982.

"However, there was not an entertaining, educational cultural center to
visit that presents that story," Sharp said.

There are various creationist-themed centers and museums around the country,
but Sharp's museum represents a new wave. These museums are offering
high-quality dinosaur replicas near major cities or tourist destinations,
such as the Great Passion Play, which draws about 400,000 people a year to
its 4,100-seat outdoor amphitheater and its New Holy Land Tour of life-size
replicas of biblical sites.

Debbie Archer, 45, said of evolutionists, "They hold all the other ideas as
false. They act as if creationism is based all on faith and fantasy and not
on fact. And that's simply not true."

No explanation of the origins of life on Earth can be proved definitively.
But the 

    
 <http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=U.S.+Supreme+Court> U.S.
Supreme Court ruled in the 1987 case of Edwards vs. Aguillard that
creationism, which the court deemed to be religion, may not be taught in
public schools because it would violate the 1st Amendment's establishment
clause calling for separation of church and state.

Partly as a result, the dominant current challenger to evolution in
education is intelligent design, which asserts that there is a scientific
argument that some complexities of nature, unexplained by Darwin's theory,
cannot be the result of random mutation, but must be the work of an unnamed
intelligence. Some critics call it "creationism lite."

Bush ramps up debate


    
 <http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news/?p=President+Bush> President Bush
unexpectedly amplified the debate last week, fortifying proponents of
intelligent design and biblical creationists. Bush, who as Texas governor
favored teaching both evolution and creationism, said students today should
be taught evolution and intelligent design "so people can understand what
the debate is about."

"Teach the controversy" is one of intelligent design's marketing mantras.
But the mainstream scientific community holds that there is nothing
scientific about intelligent design and no credible controversy over
evolution as the foundation block of modern biology. 


In a statement, the National Science Teachers Association described itself
as "stunned and disappointed" by Bush's words. But the president is in a
powerful position on the issue, as the majority of Americans long have
agreed with his view. Since the early 1980s, polls have consistently
indicated that a majority or near-majority of Americans believe both
evolution and creationism, the biblical account of human origins, should be
taught. 


That may not be surprising in a nation where more than a quarter of
Americans are evangelical Christians, many holding creationist views, and
96.8 percent claim some religious belief, according to the 2004 National
Survey of Religion and Politics released by the Pew Forum on Religion and
Public Life. 


"Many Americans think these religious ideas should be taught in school
because they believe them and they're true. But a lot of Americans say that
because they think it's fair," said John Green, a Pew fellow and director of
the Bliss Institute of Applied Politics at the University of Akron, which
conducted the poll. 


Dual teachings 


"We who teach in the more liberal academies tend to forget that those who
take biology classes are also being taught on the weekends how to interpret
that in church," said Phillip Goff, director of the Center for the Study of
Religion and American Culture at Indiana University. America's argument over
evolution, which grabbed the world's attention at the 1925 Scopes "Monkey
Trial," is an old one, perhaps the oldest in the culture wars, according to
David Masci, a senior fellow at the Pew Forum. 


"I think one of the reasons it's popping up now is you have a tremendous
infrastructure of conservative Christian groups, connected to conservative
Christian churches, that's grown up in the last 40 years," he said. 


It is evident around the country that evolution's critics and opponents are
bringing their views more assertively into the public square. 


In Oklahoma, Tulsa's Park and Recreation Board voted in June to install a
display of the biblical account of creation in Genesis at the Tulsa Zoo,
then reversed itself in July under sharp criticism. 


In Kentucky, a $25 million, 50,000-square-foot Creation Museum, slated to
open in 2007, is under construction by the non-profit Answers in Genesis,
one of the world's largest creationist organizations. 


In Texas, the Odessa school board is under fire this month for voting to
introduce an elective biblical history and literature course that opponents
say contains blatantly sectarian and creationist material. 


And soon, the Kansas State Board of Education is expected to finalize new
science standards that criticize Darwin's theory and open the door to
alternative explanations of human origins, including intelligent design. 


So far in 2005, intelligent design has been considered for curricula
inclusion in at least 25 cases by state legislatures and school boards,
according to the National Center for Science Education, a non-profit
organization in Oakland that defends the teaching of evolution in public
schools. 


Devoid of any reference to the biblical or the divine, intelligent design
thus far has skirted the Supreme Court's ban on creationism in the
classroom. That issue and the scientific validity of intelligent design will
be put to the first major test in September, when a federal judge hears the
case brought by a Pennsylvania parent group against the Dover Area School
District's decision to include intelligent design in biology classes. 


Creationists like Sharp don't think intelligent design goes far enough but
nevertheless are buoyed by its rising profile. 


"You've got these incredibly credentialed scientists who are starting to
question what, for 100 years, has been accepted as standard," he said,
referring primarily to the fellows at the Discovery Institute, a
Seattle-based think tank that is funding research into intelligent design by
scientists. 


Riding the dinosaurs 


Meanwhile, dinosaurs provide a potent platform for evangelism. 


"Everyone is totally fascinated by dinosaurs," said Dennis Lindsay,
president and chief executive officer of Christ for the Nations, a
non-profit international Bible ministry that is co-founding the Dallas
museum. 


"It will be an attraction to have those and share the story that, from our
position and opinion, dinosaurs did not live 65 million years ago," he said,
referring to many creationists' belief in a biblical Earth age of less than
10,000 years. 


It is important to many creationists that man and dinosaur lived
simultaneously because they believe there was no death in the world until
Adam and Eve sinned in the Garden of Eden. If the Genesis story is false,
they say, then there would be no need for Jesus Christ to redeem the sins of
the world. 


Thus, at the Museum of Earth History, Genesis dictates gentle, vegetarian
dinosaurs sharing Eden with Adam and Eve, whose vaguely Polynesian
appearance represents all races, according to a guide. Another exhibit
confirms that dinosaurs, like all land creatures created on Day 6, were on
Noah's Ark. The exhibit maintains that the ark could accommodate them
because it was huge--450 feet long, 75 feet wide and 45 feet high--and only
smaller, adolescent dinosaurs were put on board. 


Such literal interpretation is essential, Sharp said, because "if we lose
Genesis as a legitimate scientific and historical explanation for man, then
we lose the validity of Christianity. Period." 


---------- 


lbanderson at tribune.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://duvel.te.verweg.com/pipermail/cpprot/attachments/20050808/9937fee6/attachment.htm